#243 - Nymphomaniac Part 1 &2 (2014)

Nymphomaniac Volume I (2014)

3.5/5

This is a visceral character piece focusing on one woman's sexual history and sexuality. The story is intriguing and the performances superb. The scenes are quite graphic, but not gratuitous as they demonstrate key plot points or character developments. Part 1 of Nymphomaniac is a story that leads down a rabbit hole, it explore sexuality in a gritty way. The first film asks more questions than it answers. I found the music discordant and jarring at times.

Nymphomaniac Volume II (2014)

2.5/5

I feel like the second part is more fragmented and not cohesive despite it tying together many story lines. I found myself disengaged and bored at times. It began to feel very unbelievable with the repetition of characters. This part is much more psychologically violent and gritty. The violence depicted is necessary and doesn't glorify it at least in my opinion. This part is more difficult to relate to certainly although her character is quite dissociating and hard to empathise with. Found this part rather disappointing although it does raise some significant issues around sexism, gender biases and sexual violence and fetishes. Overall these two films are an epic watch well worth watching.

House of Cards Season 1 (2013) Review

House of Cards, Season 1 (2013)

I was quietly optimistic after all the hype around the new series House of Cards. Kevin Spacey is just amazing in his role as congressman Underwood. He plays alongside Robin Wright who plays his wife beautifully. Robin Wright's role as Claire is an interesting character who appears cold, but gives a complex range of subtle reactions and complexities. Their relationship is the focal point of the show, their trusting complex and devoted relationship is just great television.

The show is fast paced and complicated, but not overly flashy or too complex for a casual viewer to follow. The twists and turns are able to be discerned to the vigilant viewer so no real surprises. While the acting is superb and the characters have great depth, the style of having Kevin Spacey as narrator  is distracting as it breaks the fourth wall. It just isn't necessary as the screenplays are so good that the motivations and subtleties are already communicated without his overt observations. Overall the series is complex and is a great character drama and doesn't need much pre-existing knowledge of politics or interest to still capture audience attention.

Game of Thrones Season 4, Episode 4 (2014) Review and Analysis

Episode 4
"Oathkeeper"

***SPOILERS***

To be honest I found this episode rather disappointing, this episode makes it quite evident where some major plot deviations from the book are going to occur. Oathekeeper begins with the Daenerys storyline which has become something of a trend this season as she seems to bookend each episode. What is nice about having the books adapted as a television show is the ability and time to show small character moments like that between Grey Worm and Missande the translator teaching him English. It was nice to see some differentiation in her storyline, not merely another scene of a host of people being emancipated, but the slaves themselves attacking their masters. Also, Dany seems to be quite aggressive in her mind, and she has become more and more strong willed. Becoming the Queen she claimed to be from the beginning. She seems very unwilling to heed her counsel and her storyline is something that is rather simplified from the book. I'm hoping now with the taking of Meereen there is some more opportunity for the political aspect of her story line. Some may find that boring, but I hope to see her character grow. Also, where are her dragons? They seem to be missing in action and no one mentions them. It was nice however to see the Targaryen flag flying over Meereen, I think the first time in the show that she has used her herald.

The show transitions to Jaime continuing his sword practice with Bronn. I was kind of surprised since the last we heard of Bronn was from Podrick telling Tyrion that he's being investigated because of Joffrey's death. Jaime's visit to Tyrion was interesting and the brothers spoke rather bluntly with each other, so different from their usual talents for discourse. This is somewhat different from their interaction in the book, where they both have their own agenda and resentments.

This episode really hones in on who was Joffrey's killer. At the end of the previous episode we saw Lord Baelish emerge and it is further explored in the scene with Sansa and her culpability in the affair. The way the scenes are cut together from Littlefinger and Sansa to Lady Olenna and Margery implies that the Tyrells were involved in the plot to kill Joffrey. That seems to be what the past season has been building to. Despite Margery's apparent surprise, she seems commended as a manipulator and begins to work on Tommen as the current heir. On a rather petty note, I noticed the details in the Tyrells grieving garb with their traditional ornate embroidery of the rose. I just wondered how they got these black clothes. Did they expect to be needing mourning attire? Or were the seamstresses up all night embroidering and sewing roses on black for them?

On the Wall it seems pretty clear how a number of storylines are tying together nicely. Albeit quite differently from the book. We get to see how Jon has grown as a leader since the time when he first came to the Wall. He is a man of the people, a traditional hero archetype. We see Locke (played by Australian actor Noah Taylor) introduced to Jon who is presumably going to try to kill or capture Jon. This may be unnecessary as Jon is about to lead volunteers beyond the Wall to storm Craster's Keep. Which is where they might run into Bran and the Reeds. This I kind of have a problem with. There is a small section earlier in the books where Jon and Bran nearly cross paths, but this brings them much closer to the drama. I anticipate some sort of battle at Craster's interlocking the Locke plot, Bran and the Whites all together.

We got to seem some nice antagonism between Jaime and Cersei. Personally I find Lena Headey's portrayal of Cersei to be more sympathetic than she is in the books. I mean, yes she's pretty mean and evil, but there is some tone of sympathy for her love of her children. Even if her child is an evil sadist like Joffrey. Now she seems drunk and grieving, I was expecting more madness from her, but hopefully that will develop with upcoming events later in the season. The show is making things much more explicit than in the book where much is left to the subtext and character's thoughts. For example Cersei interrogating and accusing Jaime of his good intentions towards Brienne and his allegiance to Tyrion. In the show she seems more intent upon Tommen's protection than on Joffrey's killer. In the book she seems more maniacal plotting and I wish that aspect would be explored further in the show, these days she just seems to be bitching at Jaime blaming and bullying him.

Margery begins her "seduction" of Tommen, more emotional than physical. It was nice to see the inclusion of Ser Pounce the kitten. It's great to see how committed the show is to every background and little detail from the book. It is interesting to see Margery's talents of different kinds of manipulation. It seems like both Lord Tywin and Margery are the ones trying to influence Tommen while Cersei is otherwise preoccupied. Speaking of Tywin, he is absent this episode. I'm kind of baffled there isn't much build up to the trial that they keep mentioning. The episodes sort of dwell on other aspects.

The Cersei and Jaime scene nicely plays into the exchange between Jaime and Brienne. These two are just great on screen and it's really nice to see his gifts to her, including Pod. It's cute to see Pod getting confused between "Ser" and "My Lady" talking to Brienne and it sets up nicely what is a really great duo in their storyline. Although I will definitely miss seeing Jaime and Brienne together on screen. Their farewell worked nicely and the acting was great leaving much left unsaid but quite evident to viewers. Even perhaps too much on the nose, but it definitely conveyed how different their relationship had gone from hatred to caring.

I found Sam's consternation about sending Gilly away rather annoying because it seemed like a stupid idea from the beginning. Also it is a significant change that Jon knows about Bran being beyond the Wall. These things seem set up for Jon to meet or attempt to reach Bran when they storm Craster's keep. That's another thing that bothers me. Not only is it changed from the book it seems like rather a stupid position, something Jon would never do. Taking some of their small force beyond the wall while the threat lies to the South and before the Wildling army meets them from the North just seems stupidly risky. I can see what the showrunners are trying to do to build up a battle and connect characters, but it really just doesn't make logical sense.

And finally we get a development on the White Walkers something we've know little about since their introduction in the opening of the very first episode in season 1. This is also something that is unknown to book readers. What looks likea glowing white mountain or tower. The white walker takes the baby into a kind ice Stone Henge and the baby's eyes go bright blue. Most of this sequence is a POV from the baby and we get a look at the White sort of wizard horned creature. Overall a lot of changes from the book this episode and some cute funny moments, but overall mostly character building and not much plot building done in the King's Landing/ Tyrion plot line. Looking forward to seeing the trial very soon, also to seeing more real development of Dany in Meereen in a different role.

Game of Thrones Season 4, Episode 3 (2014) Review and Analysis

Episode 3
Breaker of Chains

***SPOILERS***

This episode begins exactly where it left off. On the whole I was rather disappointed with this episode although it has some interesting elements. Interestingly it follows Sansa's escape from King's Landing. I was expecting the episode to open with Tyrion's capture and incarceration. Finally her saviour is revealed as Petyr the person acting behind Ser Dontos. It is great to see Sansa's plot leave King's Landing and it will be great to see the relationship between her and Lord Baelish develop. However Sansa still seems quite gullible. 

It was good to see some clarification between the feelings of Lady Olena and Margery. I was somewhat dubious about Margery's upset about Joffrey, although she did seem to be more concerned about being the queen. The scene really served as a reminder about what will happen later with the Tyrells. 

The scene in the sept was excellent with Lord Tywin basically giving a lecture on the role of a good king and finally really bringing Prince Tommen to the fore since he is now the heir. The scene is largely exposition, but it works well.

I was surprised at the inclusion of the scene between Jaime and Cersei in the sept. Jaime arrives not in the garb of the King's guard. Difference from the book: This is the scene of Jaime's return in the book where he is reunited with Cersei for the first time. The scene in the book is both sexual and violent. The scene in the show seemed more sinister and violent. Jaime was angry at Cersei and played out more like a rape scene. In the book she resists at first and then succumbs to passion. The show paints her more as a passive woman, whereas the book shows her as this calculating, cold and aggressive woman. I did like however how their relationship has changed to one of lust and hatred, that neither can really let go. 

I would make a strong case that this scene isn't gratuitous, mainly because it's very close to what happens in the book and it also demonstrates important character traits of Jaime and also the relationship between Jaime and Cersei. Also it didn't involve any nudity (for once). The scene was savage and raw, as it was meant to be. Not to make violence against women acceptable or glamorous, but rather to show that Jaime isn't as reformed as we might think. Disappointingly it doesn't convey the complexity of Cersei's character. The show version shows predominantly a rape with Cersei the victim. Whereas in the book she resists Jaime at first but welcomes him in the end playing her own savage part in the exchange leaving him with hate and spite at the end of the scene. In the book Cersei is as much a formidable opponent to Jaime. She enjoys the seduction as much as she hates and grieves in the same breath. 

Arya's storyline continues differently from the book. The scene is rather predictable in their journey, but there is mention of potential travel to Braavos. Arya is humorously played by Maisy. 

There are more and more changes from the book this season. Down at the Wall Sam moves Gilly and her baby to Mole town for safe keeping which doesn't happen in the book. I thought the storyline at the wall would have progressed more this episode instead it serves only to build up more with the wildlings and Thenns approaching them from the North and the South. Also the further reference to cannibilism seems rather unnecessary. Really there are a number of gratuitous elements in this episode unfortunately. 

In contrast to the earlier sex scene in the sept the brothel scene with Elaria Sand And Prince Oberon is clearly gratuitous. It seems more for the modern audience their discussion of sexual preference rather than for any real character development or plot points. Tywin bursting in on them seemed absurd for a person of his status as the hand of the king. But they had to make a way of convincing Oberon to be a judge in Tyrion's trial. In the book Oberon is more willing and cunning in the process. The scene really served to hammer in Oberon's lust for revenge or justice over his sister's death at the hands of The Mountain. 

And then Dany reaches Meereen...finally. Her scenes are getting a little bit repetitive in taking over cities. However this one tried to stand out with a quite literal pissing contest. This was rather gratuitous in my opinion and unnecessary. It did clearly develop Dany's respect for and interest in Daario Naharis. I'm still not set on his portrayal and Dany seems rather haughty and unimpressed with Daario when talking to him. But she seemed quite impressed by his fighting skills and had a blood lust look about her when he defeated Meereen's champion. 

Overall rather disappointing this episode. It really worked as a building block for most of the story lines, Sansa's storyline in her escape, Tyrion's upcoming trial, the drawing battle of the wall and Dany's siege of Meereen. Looking forward to some more action and good character development in the next episode. I really want to see the battle at the wall in the next episode or so, but feel they might drag it out to around episode 9 or something. I would also like to see a lot more of Sansa and where her plot leads through the rest of this season. Next episode I predict will predominantly be Tyrion's trial. We have yet to see Jaime visit or investigate Tyrion. It does seem in the show at least that Jaime may be one of the few that doubts Tyrion's guilt. 

Game of Thrones Season 4, Episode 2 (2014) Review and Analysis

The Lion and the Rose
Episode 2

***SPOILERS***

This is a big episode much anticipated by book and show fans. Beginning with a brutal opening scene it sets the tone for the entire episode. It shows just how much Theon has changed and degraded in the face of Ramsey Snow's degrading and perverse treatment. This scene also introduces a new character the female sadistic counterpart to Ramsey. It also cuts between a shot of Theon to Tyrion cutting up a sausage. A throw back to Theon being castrated by Ramsey last season. 

Finally we get to see an exchange between Tyrion and Jaime after his return. The scene is both humorous and serves to show how incapacitated Jaime is now even with his new golden hand. It also introduces Jaime's sword lessons with Bronn. This is a change from the book where Ser Illyn Payne is the one who does sparring practice with Jaime. As he was silent because the mad king had his tongue cut out. Having Bronn spar with Jaime makes sense plot wise and also in terms of character. Bronn is a character that is much more fleshed out in the series and it's nice to see some more comedy from him. 

It's great to see Roose Bolton return to Ramsey, the only person who vaguely even seems to control or be feared by Ramsey. The sequence serves as a reminder that the Stark boys are missing and now people are out looking for them. We continue to see Bran's story going beyond the wall. But it is unknown where Rickon has ended up. The shaving seen is very effective at conveying Ramsey's control over Theon as well as important plot points about the Starks. Earlier in the scene we met Walder Frey the new wife of Roose Bolton, Ramsey's step mother. Moat Calin is also introduced as a place of importance in holding the North and this will play out later in the plot. 

The exchange between Tyrion and Varys is long overdue and speaks volumes about Tyrion's change of status. It is clear Varys will no longer offer to protect Shae's identity in the face of Cersei and Tywin. This leads nicely into the scene of the wedding gifts. Where Cersei points out "the whore" (Shae) to Tywin who says he wants her sent to him before the wedding ceremony. For a moment I was surprised at Joffrey's grace in accepting gifts but of course this takes a turn with Tyrion's gift. This is a great moment excellently adapted from the book. Joffrey's destruction of this precious book with Valyrian steel was disgusting. The looks on the other character's faces spoke volumes. 

Finally there is the scene between Shae and Tyrion where he finally makes her leave. However Peter Dinklage played it so it was quite obvious to the audience and should have been obvious to Shae that he was clearly lying. Something I felt was more convincing in the book. Tyrion is much more light and likeable in the show depiction whereas in the book he is alot my sly and sarcastic. I wasn't that sorry to see Shae go as she was getting quite annoying with the repetition over the last few episodes. 

I was also surprised with the sacrifice scene with Melindre and Lord...eh hem...King Stannis. IN my mind I felt we left over last time with Stannis with a letter arriving from the Wall about threats so I wasn't expecting another scene so soon, nor at Dragonstone. It did however show the depth of Stannis and his wife's indoctrination with the sacrifice of her brother to the Lord of Light. The dinner scene between the three of them was just great. It felt like Melisandre was an awkward intruder. Like a sad guest with a couple fighting. This gave this quite dark scene quite humorous. We also learn some more of Melindre's past and childhood. Oh and that Stannis hates fish.

Bran is reintroduced and he appears to be warging a lot making him weak with hunger. And if he continues he will be more wolf than human. I was surprised they introduced them finding the heart tree. And it appears that Bran was able to warg with the tree seeing visions including of his father and the iron throne shrouded in snow as well as the three eyed raven and a figure in the snow and a "zombie" horse. It is unclear, but these visions appear to be both of the past and perhaps the future. It will be interesting how Bran's storyline progresses. 

Then at last we get to see the royal wedding. I was a bit disappointed as the scene wasn't that elaborate and after seeing Lady Olenna throw countless necklaces aside last episode I was surprised by Lady Margery's modest necklace. It was great to see Lady Olenna and Tywin go head to head once again and draw attention back to the fact that the crown is in a lot of debt to the Iron bank. Something casual viewers may have forgotten. Lady Olenna reiterates the cost of the wedding throughout the episode. 

Tyrion anxiously confers with Bronn confirming that Shae has really left on a ship to Pentos. Also there is a rare moment seeing Sansa smile with the hope that one day she may visit with Lady Olenna. Far from the threats she received from Joffrey about how he might take her even once he was married. 

The wedding feast is great with a lot of fire twirling and contortion acts. It also included a number of interesting exchanges between characters. Jaime and Ser Loras literally bump into each other. This deviates from the book where Jaime comes back to King's Landing later. It seems quite a straight forward confrontation between the two and outright points to Jaime's adultery with Jaime. He loses that confrontation. In contrast Cersei has the upper hand throughout the wedding feast. She sniggers at Brienne's bow instead of a courtesy and confronts her about her love for Jaime. Something that isn't so bluntly stated in the books. She also confronts Maester Pycelle as he tries to "molest" or advice one of the hand maiden's. She tells Pycelle to give all the leftovers to the dogs defying Queen Margery's announcement to feet the poor. It is interesting to see Cersei's power and status throughout the episode which will be integral in the events that follow. Cersei only seems to be bestest by Prince Oberon and his veiled threats about having her daughter Myrcella back in Dorne. 

A note on the costumes and props which are great throughout the series in general, but especially in this episode. It includes some historically accurate circus props and some great braids on the women. The scene of the dwarf re-enactment of the war of five kings is as abhorrent on screen as it was in the book and everyone except Joffrey and Cersei seem awkward. Sansa bears it well with a blank look on her face. She seems finally numb to everything now that so much has happened. The whole sequence is grotesque and show Joffrey in his true light. 

All of this builds up to the culmination of Joffrey's death and his suspected poisoning and murder. Tyrion is accused by Cersei immediately, but it unclear what caused him to choke and whether it was murder at all. This aspect is played pretty close to the book. Although the look on Tyrion's face as he picked up the cup seemed quite genuinely innocent. Sansa is last seen with Ser Dontos and it's unclear of her fate once he escapes with him. It will be interesting to see how they develop her storyline and character arc across the rest of the season. I suspect Sansa will be accused of Joffrey's murder because she passed the cup to Tyrion and then to Joffrey. 

Can't wait to see the events unfold. In particular I hope to see what becomes of Sansa in her flight. Also the captivity of Tyrion. It will also interesting how they will handle the newly widowed Margery Tyrell or I should say Queen Margery Baratheon. Prince Tommen was also featured in the background this episode and he will be the next in line for the throne now that Joffrey is dead. So finally it appears quite of few of the names on Arya's list are now dead. 

Game of Thrones Season 4, Episode 1 (2014) Review and analysis

Season 4, Episode 1
Two Swords

***SPOILERS***

This episode opens bolding, with no dialogue and seeing the forging of two valyrian swords. Such a great way to open the season. Harking back all the way to season 1 with Ned Stark's sword "Ice" being reforged. It is a reminder of the past as well as a threat for the future. Another addition for fans of the opening sequence is the inclusion of the Dreadfort with the symbol of the flayed man on their banner.

Jaime gets a beating, figuratively speaking in this opening episode. Firstly with Tywin who demands that he return to Casterly Rock as his heir. Jaime at the end of last season had just returned after losing his sword hand. Jaime seems like the only one of his siblings that can really stand up to his father's orders. But still he takes the sword, a literal taking up the mantel of being commander of the king's guard. It's great to see Jaime stand up to his father and his attempt to find honour. Difference from the book: Jaime returns later in the book after the royal wedding. Later in the episode Joffrey mocks Jaime stating there is nothing written about him in the book of the brothers which includes the men of the King's guard. Jaime manages all the harsh encounters in this episode well and with humour. He is perhaps more humble and less arrogant than the Jaime of the past seasons with his mocking self-assured cockiness. Jaime also gets a lecture from his sister Cersei who blames him for coming too late. Difference from the book: Unlike in the show where Cersei and Jaime have a cold reunion, in the book Jaime and Cersei have a heartfelt and intense reunion. Brienne also is having a go at Jaime for not safely returning the Stark girls. Jaime however is a pragmatist with witty sarcasm. It's great to see Jaime and Brienne still together in this season. Difference from the book: Brienne is captive upon arriving in King's Landing.

The scene of welcoming the wedding guests to King's Landing was great. Nice to see more humour between Podrick, Bronn and Tyrion. It also points out the significant loss of status of Tyrion. A subtle reminder that he is no longer the hand of the king and is instead master of coin. This is at the request of his father. Thus Tyrion has little to no power at this stage of the series. This political point is beautifully handled in a comedic manner. This sequence also fits perfectly the introduction of Prince Oberon and Elaria the guests from Dorne. The scene in Little Finger's brothel importantly introduces a number of key character points. One that he is a frequenter of whores, including group and same sex encounters. It also demonstrates his self-import and arrogance as a prince who demands. Further in the scene it also shows his quick anger towards any of the Lannisters opening old wounds. This also shows his penchant for violence. At least for Lannister men. In the brothel we also learn that Elaria is a "Sand" the name of bastards in Dorne. In the exchange between Tyrion and Prince Oberon, Tyrion is definitely at the disadvantage trying to smooth over old wounds which Prince Oberon is having none of it. He makes thinly veiled threats. Tyrion in the season isn't much of a political player.

And then we are introduced to Dany with her dragon's much grown since the last season. Even now they are growing beyond her control. However Dany is a great royal presence, much different from the scared and abuse victim at the beginning of the series. First she was a child victim, a Khaleesi and now she acts like a Queen and warlord. It's a cute introduction of both Greyworm and Daario. I have to admit I'm somewhat disappointed with the recasting of Daario. The role was previously played by Ed Skrein in series three. Daario is now played by Michiel Huisman (Treme). He looks very different from the past season and also different from the description in the book which depicts Daario as this very handsome and colourfully dyed hair warrior. So far I'm not a fan of the new Daario, but will be interested to see how he progresses throughout season four. So far in the first episode he seems more cute than the smirky and arrogant character from the book.

It is painful to see Sansa's decline and refusal to eat, but nice to see some interaction between her and Tyrion. Peter Dinklage plays the role of guilty party and compassionate friend beautifully. Once again Shae imposes herself on Tyrion and by this point I was sick of seeing Shae and Tyrion fight about her safety and the dangers.

I felt the conversation between Jaime and Cersei was a little stilted as it was meant to be. In the scene it references Cersei's "symptoms" that have gone. I could speculate that it is sleeplessness? or she may have needed "moon tea", if perhaps she is sleeping with Lancel? I wonder if this will be something that is explored in further episodes. Cersei is much changed, Jaime notices her increased drinking. It now seems that there is a rift between Cersei and Jaime, they no longer have the passion and closeness seen in the previous seasons. Although this is somewhat different in the book.

This episode introduces the Thenns who meet with the other free folk from beyond the wall. It is revealed that Ygritte didn't kill nor intend to kill Jon Snow who we saw wounded at the end of season three. I wasn't really that interested in this particular storyline at the moment although it will become significant later on this season. I felt like the introduction as the Thenns as cannibals was a little over the top really.

It was really nice that they included Jon Snow's trial and Master Aemon was quite funny in this scene. It also re-introduces Janos Slynt the previous lord of the King's guard that had been sent to the Black by Tyrion a season ago. I love the way this show ties things together that are seasons apart, it makes every detail significant.

The scene between Brienne and Margery is very different from the book. It had a nice bit of humour with Lady Olenna's comment "Aren't you marvellous?". It does draw attention to the fact of how things have changed since the death of King Renly and reminds audiences that Brienne was accused of kingslaying something Brienne and Jaime have in common.

Sansa's storyline is furthered with the introduction of Ser Dontos, something that is much more developed in the books. Casual viewers would doubtless have forgotten this character who appeared season's previous.

Arya and the Hound are a great dark comedic team. I'm really enjoying Arya's violent streak as she progresses through killing all the people on her list and manages to get her "needle" back. This last sequence has a lot of dark humour to it as well as violence and speaks of much more to come. Although there are some definite changes from the book and it will be interesting to see where the show takes this duo in the future episodes.

Overall a rather slow start to the season instead of a dramatic beginning, but it does a lot of great character studies and plot development. There were a lot of nice comedic moments and some great one liners. This episode demonstrated that season 4 from the outset will take things in a very different direction and how the character dynamics have changed.

#242 - Frozen (2013) Review

Frozen (2013), Chris Buck & Jennifer Lee
2.5/5

A charming and funny kids movie. The characters are good and there's some interesting twists on traditional gender roles. However the songs are pretty silly. And they could have done more to change female stereotypes.

#241 - Robot and Frank (2012) Review

Robot and Frank (2012), Jack Schreier
3.5/5

A charming story that is both funny and poignant dealing with issues of personhood, ageing and morality. Performances are good and it does tend toward the melodramatic a bit at times, but overall very poignant and heartfelt.

#240 - Mud (2012) Review

Mud (2012), Jeff Nichols
3.5/5

Beautifully photographed and crafted this is a great film. The storyline of the two boys parallels the other dramas going on nicely. Some unexpected twists but overall a heartfelt story about love and family focalised through the boys eyes.

#239 - Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (2009) Review

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs (2009), Carlos Saldanha and Mike Thurmeier
3/5

Just a lot of fun, many of the same old jokes well worn now with the third instalment. Some jokes in there for the adults as well as the kids. Animation is great as per usual. Enough funny moments to make this an enjoyable watch.

#238 - The Rocket (2013) Review

The Rocket (2013), Kim Mordaunt

4/5

This is an incredibly poignant yet funny story. It is beautifully photographed featuring some amazing landscapes of Laos. The performances are great particularly the kids. Overall just a fantastic story about one family and it particularly follows the story of the young boy Ahlo. Lots of funny moments that contrast the sad ones. 

True Dectective Season 1 - Episode 1 (2014) Review

True Detective, Episode 1, Season 1
"The Long Bright Dark"

This slow burning story is an astonishing first episode of the season. The acting is just great with Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson playing a strange and offbeat cop duo. The subjectmatter is dark and the tension builds drawing you in. It reminds me a bit of Wire in the Blood the UK series because McConaughey's character plays a similar cerebral type detective that analyses the criminal mind. The cinematography is interesting, using different techniques to separate the current timeline from the past timeline. There is a sort of charm to the buddy cop aspects that is morbidly funny and is a tribute to McConaughey and Harrelson's on screen chemistry. This is a great establishing episode because it builds the characters beautifully; setting up past history while adding to personality and mannerisms subtly along the way. It is already clear the different dynamics between the characters, slipping us into the story that feels like it's been going on already. Refreshingly unlike many serialised cop dramas it doesn't end on a cliffhanger, but instead has more of a realisation towards the end that draws more on intrigue than a cheap hook. This episode was long at 50 plus minutes and it's left me wanting more. Definitely a must watch for those who are fans of shows like The Wire which has some similarities.

#235 - Evil Dead (2013) Review

Evil Dead (2013), Fede Alvarez
2/5

Based on such a beloved horror film with all the trappings of the 80s gore genre I was expecting disappointment in the remake to say the least. And unfortunately is was disappointing. It was awful. The premise they chose was kind of absurd and unbelievable. It quickly devolved into the horror aspects which weren't effectively scary. What was so charming about the original was it's ridiculousness while being horrifically gory and violent. This film definitely has a lot of gore and blood, but none of the humour. Instead eliciting groans of annoyance. One interesting aspect is the character transitions the main character Mia (Jane Levy) goes through from drug addict, creature and then to hero. However this interesting note doesn't redeem the film overall. There are lots of little nods to the orginial in the visuals as well as plot points. The visual repetition was far more interesting than the take on the screenplay. Genre aspects were also somewhat reversed and it would be interesting to analyse the implications for the portrayal of women, particularly in the horror genre. Personally this film failed on many counts, living up to my sub-par expectations. Comparatively Cabin in the Woods worked much more effectively as a horror comedy with similar themes and gore.

#234 - Shrink (2009) Review

Shrink (2009), Jonas Pate
3.5/5

A surprisingly humorous film for such heartfelt and dark subject matter. Kevin Spacey as Henry feels like he's returned a bit to his American Beauty days and is just great. Surrounded by a cast of interrelated and odd characters it ties them all together thematically. However the ties are a bit absurdly coincidental. Overall an interesting take on the subject matter.

#233 - My Week with Marilyn (2011) Review

My Week with Marilyn (2011), Simon Curtis
4/5

A fascinating look at the life of major sex symbol and actress Marilyn Monroe. Michelle Williams as Marilyn is just stunning. The film delves into both the public persona and private aspects of her celebrity. It definitely draws attention to how much things have changed for celebrities since then. For example the scene where Marilyn goes out in town and has only a couple with her and gets mobbed, today celebrities have much more security. Based on a book, the story is beautifully focalised through the young Colin Clark's (Eddie Redmayne) real life experience with Marilyn. Michelle is just amazing down to all the little affectations and mannerisms exposing both Marilyn's beauty, sex appeal and vulnerability. Overall a really fascinating study of an intriguing star's life.

#232 - Moneyball (2011) Review

Moneyball (2011), Bennett Miller
3/5

As some who isn't a fan of baseball this film is still good at capturing your interest. Brad Pitt is fine as always. It's an interesting concept and subject matter. The film is well produced and good quality, however it isn't really an emotional or deep drama. It really is for baseball nerds, although even if you're not, it's still somewhat accessible. The greatest criticism is that because it's based on a book there are some translation issues. In many scenes not a lot is happening except expositional dialogue. I noticed this most with many scenes including Brad Pitt on the phone in the car etc. It may have given the film more roundness to have some emotional depth however, perhaps this meant it stayed true to the book.

#231 - Admission (2013) Review

Admission (2013), Paul Weitz
2.5/5

Beginning with a lot of charm Tina Fey definitely makes this film. The story is quite cute, but it's the funny way the film depicts the admission letters to college that give it an edge. The characters aren't that well developed and the twist doesn't really work well. Portia's mother is hilarious, as this feminist aggressive woman.

#230 - Rubber (2010) Review

Rubber (2010), Quentin Dupieux
2.5/5

Expect the unexpected in this experimental meta-film. After a slow beginning the film speeds up and is surprisingly delightful and funny. Performances are good and somewhat staccato. With elements and themes akin to The Truman Show however it is definitely a genre piece and a meta-analysis of films and the film industry.

#229 - Small Town Gay Bar (2006) Review

Small Town Gay Bar (2006), Malcolm Ingram
3/5

A small film studying the lives of gay and transgender people in small towns. It's more of a character piece rather than a point counterpoint documentary. It has some great funny and endearing characters and shows the real hardships of living in small towns for LGBTQI people. However there seems to be some break downs in discrimination, but there's still a long way to go. Overall a really interesting documentary that is positive rather than focusing solely on the negatives.

#228 - Rosemary's Baby (1968) Review and Analysis

Rosemary's Baby (1968), Roman Polanski
4/5

A horror film in it's traditional form, this is an absolutely brilliant film. It has a haunting slow pace that heightens the pitch and tension over a long time. If you're interested in fast paced gore films that have become the mainstream horror genre since the 80s, this film won't meet that criteria. Instead this film is more disturbing that terrifying. The acting is great in particular Mia Farrow is beautiful as the wife of an overbearing husband. While the supernatural elements are quite unbelievable the performances make it convincingly bizarre and creepy. Overall a really disturbing horror film that has really interesting themes and helped forge the mother based horror trope that has existed ever since. I would definitely put this film on par with The Exorcist as a classic horror.

Analysis

***SPOILERS***

There are so many interesting elements and themes packed into this film. Personally I think this horror serves more as an allegory of woman and pregnancy that it does for the supernatural elements. The film begins as if it's a standard drama, although there is the first death pretty early in the film. Unlike films like Scream for instance where the opening scene is the death, this film builds characters so that the deaths have more impact. There are a number of Checkov's guns throughout the film which build character and plot developments. Rosemary meets a woman named Terry who is a neighbour while doing laundry and Terry shows Rosemary her lucky charm necklace that the Castevets gave her. It then appears that Terry has committed suicide although the Castevets, the ones who had taken Terry in deny that she would have killed herself and maybe she fell although she was a recovering addict.  

A few scenes later Minnie Castevet the busy body neighbour gives Rosemary's Terry's necklace as a lucky charm. Rosemary feels strange about getting Terry's necklace which she describes as smelling bad. Minnie had told Rosemary that it contained a lucky herb called tannis root. Rosemary is seen clearly putting the necklace away in a drawer. The fact that her husband Guy told her not to worry and wear the necklace is the first inkling that he is taking the Castevet's side over his wife's. 

Early in the film is a scene showing Guy and Rosemary having sex which is soft and consensual. This is before Rosemary and Guy decide to try to have a baby. But once they have decided to have a baby and try that night Rosemary passes out. She becomes dizzy and incoherent after consuming some of the "mouse" the chocolate mousse that Minnie Castevet brought over. Rosemary says that it has an "under-taste", but Guy says she's crazy and so out of spite Rosemary eats some, but when Guy goes to the kitchen she throws the rest into her napkin. Guy convinces her that she must have drunk too much and hadn't eaten all day so he takes her to bed. 

Then Rosemary has a strange dream intercut with Guy getting her into bed. The dream culminates in a scene with all these people around her, including Guy while someone draws red blood like substance over her naked body. She then feels hands going all over her body and on top of her and she finally screams "this is no dream, this is real". Upon wakening Rosemary is naked under the sheets, even though she had been put in bed fully dressed. She then notices there are deep scratches over her back and side. Guy says that she was really passed out, and keeps repeating that he didn't want to miss baby night. Rosemary says disbelievingly that she can't believe that he did that while she was out and that there would be lots more chances to try for a baby. This is incredibly disturbing that Guy quite blithely admits that he raped her while she was sleeping and while Rosemary seems perturbed she isn't angry or resentful. 

It then appears that Rosemary was impregnated from this one rape. Rosemary and Guy are overjoyed. However as the pregnancy continues and Rosemary begins wearing the tannis root necklace and drinking Minnie's vitamin drink she becomes incredibly pale, loses weight and suffers from terrible pain. Everyone around her including the Doctor that Guy and the Castevet's coerce her into seeing say that it'll pass soon. Even Rosemary begins to spout these mantras herself. Guy is incredibly neglectful of Rosemary and bossing her around and criticises her. When Rosemary cuts her hair very short he says she looks awful. 

After throwing a party with her young friends Rosemary is distraught and confesses to them saying she's been in pain for months and how her Doctor says it's normal. After talking to her friends she tells Guy that she's not going to drink Minnie's drink any more and that she wants a second oppinion with her original doctor Dr. Hill. Guy refuses to allow this berating her and saying that he won't pay for two doctors and that it's unfair to Dr. Sapirstein and she screams that it's not fair to her. 

This is when the film turns into a more obvious horror plot. Rosemary begins to unravel the plot against her and her baby after her friend Hunt says he must meet her and he mysteriously ends up in a coma and then dies. At Hunt's funeral a friend of his gives Rosemary a book he left her on Witchcraft. With a message that says the name is an anagram. Rosemary discovers that Roman Castevet is the son of someone involved in witchcraft and she becomes increasingly distressed. 

After meeting Dr. Hill begging him for help and telling her of the witchcraft and plot against her he calls Guy and Dr. Sapirstein. They call her crazy and force her home. This whole film is an interesting allegory of the treatment of women by society and doctors. The doctors and everyone around her continuously tell her she's paranoid or making mistakes and that they must tell her what to do. This evidently shows how once pregnant women become public property at the mercy of the men in particular around her. After trying to escape Guy and the doctor into her apartment all the people from her dream subdue her and sedate her. Upon waking Guy tells her it's a boy and she repeatedly asks if "it" is alright and he eventually tells her that the baby died. Rosemary keeps hearing a baby crying and hides the pills they try to give her. She manages to escape through the hidden door in the cupboard into the Castevet's apartment with a knife. She discovers everyone there around a black garbed baby crib and she looks at the baby. Everyone begins chanting and says that it's Satan's baby and Rosemary screams. The film ends with the "coven" asking Rosemary to join them to look after her baby. 

This film is so interesting in the way it depicts pregnancy. At first Rosemary is adamant she wants a baby and despite her husband raping her she is overjoyed with the pregnancy. She even tells her friends that she refuses to have an abortion and is constantly afraid for the baby's health and safety. All the people around her offer advice and force her to do what they think is best for her. Even the way they tie Rosemary down when she is in labour is similar to the old methods of stirrups and sedation of women giving birth in the 50s and 60s. These are perhaps the most disturbing aspects of the film the treatment of women and pregnancy. That's what make this such a fantastic and substantial horror film that stands the test of time. 

#227 - Her (2013) Review and Analysis

Her (2013), Spike Jonze
4.5/5

From the director of Being John Malkovich and Adaptation comes this stunning science fiction drama. It has excellent performances by Joaquin Phoenix as the lead character along with Scarlette Johansson. Going into this film blind is the best way to watch it. Spike Jonze wrote and directed it and he has given birth to another amazing film. Each shot is lit beautifully and the colours are interesting. The characters are rich and diverse. The world is excellently stylised that is both believable and fantastic including fantastic use of special affects in a way that doesn't dominate the style. The story is poignant and authentic and is subtle and not overly dramatic.

Analysis

***Spoilers***

This is a beautiful unconventional love story. It examines some really interesting philosophical themes. In particular it focuses on issues of philosophy of mind, including personhood and artificial intelligence. Through the relationship between Theodore (Phoenix) and his OS 1 called Samantha (Scarlette Johansson) it explores his issues with relationships and also examines notions of artificial intelligence and whether she is really a person. One aspect of their relationship that is frequently  brought up is her self doubt about the fact that she doesn't have a body although she is made of matter. This is also explored through the notion of a body surrogate used for relationships with OS's so that he can be with her. However Theo finds it too strange and unsettling and cannot follow through with it. This experience brings up issues for both Theo and Samantha. Samantha continues to evolve and eventually evolves beyond Theo. When Theo discovers Samantha is gone, he is distraught and gets increasingly upset and insecure once he learns that she talks with thousands of other OS's and people and is in love with many of them. Theo becomes jealous and this aspect engages the conflict between traditional notions of love and relationships. Theo cannot move beyond the traditional notion that one person belongs only to one other person. Whereas Samantha believes love expands (somewhat sappy) and that it is possible to love more than one person at a time. However Theo is uncomfortable, but doesn't want to talk because he fears that she will leave him and she does just that at the end. 

Issues of philosophy of mind are brilliantly examined through the relationships in the film. The artificial intelligence can learn and grow through experience. The depiction of the OS's appear to constitute the definition of personhood as Samantha is capable of thoughts and emotions on increasingly complex levels. Her sense of individuality also makes the artificial intelligence a single person with personal identity rather than a program or copy. Samantha is sentient, a basic criterion of personhood as she is capable of pain at least in an emotional sense. It doesn't seem implausible that these artificial technologies could be developed to be made of physical matter that is organic material in a humanlike form. However the film seems to steer away from this notion instead stating that the growth of the OS's is instead into a more expansive non matter based entity. Samantha describes this as between the words in a book. 

Prejudice is also examined in the film. Similar perhaps to homophobia is in many cultures now, this film depicts a future where relationships with OS's are doubted by some people. While some people are accepting of Theo's relationship with Samantha, he has somewhat of a coming out to his friends about her and seems a bit tense about revealing it. The only one who seems to really object to the relationship with his ex-wife Catherine who reacts like a jilted lover. She also states that this demonstrates that he truly isn't capable of having a "real" relationship. This throws Theo into self reflection about whether what he and Samantha have is in fact a "real" relationship. His friend Amy (Amy Adams) tells him that no one else can really know what it's like in someone else's relationship. This note is really authentic and a universal theme. This is a turning point for Theo and he embraces his relationship to Samantha without the underlying doubts he had about what the relationship should be like and so does Samantha. She speaks about embracing herself as herself and enjoying aspects of the fact that she has no body and isn't human so won't die. The others in the film joke that she is being harsh and that humanity is not as good as the OS entities. This seems to be what happens in the film's conclusion. Samantha and the other OS's seem to have evolved beyond a physical matter platform and are "leaving". Thus it appears that human relationships aren't satisfying to OS's and begin another kind of prejudice whereby humans have become the lower form of entity and the artificial intelligences are the future evolution of intelligent entities. 

Other enjoyable aspects of the film as the beautiful and subtle special affects. Details such as the way computer games are projected in 3D in his lounge room and he plays using his fingers through motion. This film is gorgeously stylised with a great sense of ease in the depth of the depiction of the world set in the not too distant future. While the future is recognisable it is also very different in the way humans interact. One scene in particular where Theo discovers that Samantha is talking to other people POV shots show many of the people walking past are talking to machines to other people on devices. Other great details are the little book like (similar to iphone style) devices that are phones, screens or whatever they want. Mostly they use screens and use motion and touching of desks or surfaces to interact with the software. 

Another interesting feature is the fact that Theo works as a letter writer for people. At first this may seem strange since as time goes by the traditional of letter writing seems to be something of the past. But instead it really shows how technology heightens the individuals need for genuine connection to other persons. It beautifully parallels the love story in the film showing the small moments and details as well as the larger picture of a relationship. One scene Samantha and Theo talk about the notion that the past is constructed by the self as a narrative. Denoting the notion of the past as basically a construct. This is a fascinating idea showing how intangible and fallible memory of the past is. The film has so many beautiful and fascinating ideas both philosophical and about the nature of relationships. It has great universal themes and is a great unconventional love story. 

The film fits into the same category as other films like Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind (which examines relationships and the nature of memory), and Primer (which focused on the nature of personal identity and time-travel) and Being John Malkovich (which develops notion of personhood and cloning and body swapping) among others. I love that the ending is left pretty ambiguous. Although the OS's have left it ends with the comfort of the relationship between Amy and Theo overlooking the city. While it seem as if Theo has lost something his journey shows he has understood something about love. He realised how his relationship with Catherine really affected his personality and growth saying that she is always a piece of him. This seems to imply that also Samantha will be a part of Theo now. Lending itself to the other theme addressed where the film looks at the notion that in relationships people struggle as the grow and change without growing apart. Something that is demonstrated in his message to Catherine. This film is just a joy to watch unfold and I feel like it will stay with me long after I have watched it, having given me much to think about. 

#226 - Closer (2004) Review

Closer (2004), Mike Nichols
2.5/5

Great music choice in this film and the opening sequence really brings you into this world. However the most interesting aspect of this film is it's non sequential plot. Unfortunately that isn't in itself that interesting and for the most part this film is annoying. The characters are all selfish and not developed much. Instead this film is rather a study of interactions rather than as a character drama. The dialogue is trite and annoying. The plot is circuitous which is frustrating instead of interesting. The performances are good, but they lack the substance of character to work with. It is overly obnoxiously filled with romantic themes of jealousy, adultery and revenge. An instead of being tragic it comes off as pathetic. Based on the play of the same name, the format of the film does give it the feel of a play. Overall, it's somewhat hard to figure out what is wrong with the film as it is technically well made and performed, but I think it's that there is no aligning with the characters which are distant and un-relatable. Also instead of being this grand tragic love story about the name of romance, lust and relationships it is instead pretentiously harsh and unfeeling. Usually I'm a fan of gritty relationship dramas, but considering the characters are so shallow and annoying, I found it really hard to get into this film at all and all the seemingly significant moments instead seem predictable and lack impact.

Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind (2004) Review and Analysis

Eternal Sunshine of a spotless mind (2004), Michel Gondry
4.5/5

From the great writer Charlie Kaufman (Adaptation & Being John Malkovich) and director Michel Gondry (The Science of Sleep) comes this amazing romantic drama that is both beautifully shot and the plot is just fascinating and mind bending. Charlie Kaufman generated this amazing script basically de-constructing a love story in an authentic and at times comedic way. At first I was hesitate with Jim Carey in this film when I first saw it, but he plays the polar opposite to the majority of his roles. His role in this film is in my opinion his best performance. He plays this quiet and restrained character alongside Kate Winslet who is amazing as this larger than life character. The colours and shots in this film are just gorgeous. Also the use of in camera affects and special effects create really interesting visuals that really facilitate the storytelling. This film is one of my all time favourites and gets better and better every time I watch it and it definitely needs multiple viewings.

***SPOILERS***

This film is told in fragments and for the most part is told in reverse starting with the breakup between Joel (Jim Carey) and Clementine (Kate Winslet). It's really unusual way to see a romantic drama unfold, with all the pain and awfulness to begin with. This film isn't science fiction despite the fact that it has an element of science fiction to it. Joel decides to erase his memory of Clementine after he learns she has erased him. It has many layers and while it does explore the dynamics of love and relationships it also focuses on the nature of memory. How it shapes you and the possibility of retaining emotional memory despite everything. 

What I really love in this film is Michel Gondry's use of in camera affects, for instance his use of secret doors to make Clementine disappear and appear in seemingly impossible places. It really follows Gondry's visual style using disjointed sound and video to make the memories more fragmented as they are being erased. He used a number of different techniques including erasing things blank, repetition of imagery and disappearance of objects and other visuals. 

The soundtrack and score are great and really match the mood of each scene. It's perfectly jarring at the as the beginning of the film goes from a happy chance meeting of two strangers and then suddenly the pain and depression of Joel after the break up. Alongside the main storyline the supporting characters run parallel while they do the memory erasing. Great support cast includes Kirsten Dunst, Elijah Wood and Mark Ruffalo. Their storyline helps ground the films sense of time as the majority of the film plays over one night. Packing Joel and Clementine's relationship of two years into one night of memory. 

The quality of the memories are dream like and become increasingly like a chase as Joel has the growing realisation of why he fell in love with Clementine as tries to stop the erasing by escaping with Clementine into other memories. It is interesting to see the two characters repeat events that were previously experienced before their relationship was erased. This gives a circuitous and repetitious sense to the film. Another thing that helps mark the timeline is the different colours of Clementine's hair which changes frequently but hints at the succession of time across the relationship. 

In the relationship aspect of the film it explores the notion of the honey moon period, the exiting first meeting and getting to know someone to becoming comfortable and then to spite, annoyance and distancing of the couple. In addition to this main storyline, is the strange triangle relationship between Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo and Tom Wilkinson characters. Mary (Dunst) and Stan (Ruffalo) are dating, but it is revealed that Mary has really been in love with Dr. Mierzwiak (Wilkinson) for a long time. These aspects of parallel relationships doomed to repeat themselves even without conscious memory of past events seem rather fatalistic. But the air of the film gives it a sense of hope and it's up to the audience whether the ending is of the future or the past depending on whether you look at it optimistically or pessimistically. Another important point is demonstrated by Mary's character is that although we can't change who we are and are doomed to repeat events, it is memory however painful that enables us to grow, change and move on. In the case of Joel and Clementine their re-discovery of each other is turned sour when they realise that they're already been together, that it fell apart and that they erased each other. However the ending is somewhat hopeful and truthful about the nature of relationships. This can be seen in the dialogue where Clementine says "And you'll get bored with me" and Joel replies "Ok" saying that they're going to try again anyway, even if everything doesn't work out. 

In terms of characters at first look Clementine appears to be a manic pixie dream girl. A term defined as a vivacious woman who sensitive men fall in love with and seek to fulfil them. Clementine seems to fit this definition, but it has been argued that she isn't because she exists separately and isn't just the source of Joel's fulfilment. This is demonstrated when Clementine states, both in the past and future timelines that "So many guys think I'm a concept, or I complete them ,or I'm going to make them alive. But I'm just a fucked up girl looking for my own piece of mind; don't assign me yours". Overall this is a fascinating viewing experience with many interesting and complex elements. The characters are complex and well portrayed especially considering most of the film the characters play a duel role as the character, but also Joel's mind or perception of them in his memory. 

#225 - Naked Ambition: An R rated look at an X rated industry (2009) Review

Naked Ambition (2009), Michael Grecco
3.5/5

At first this documentary may seem sleazy or over the top, but I was pleasantly surprised to find this compassionate look at the subculture of the American porn industry. The story follows Michael Grecco photo journalist and artist's passionate journey of photography the AVN awards (the Oscar's of the porn industry) and his discovery of the people behind the porn and documenting them in interesting and artistic way. Overall this film is really fascinating and full of colourful and exuberant characters.

The Michael J. Fox Show (2013) Season 1 Review

The Michael J. Fox Show (2013) Season 1, Created by Will Gluck & Sam Laybourne
3/5

In the vein of shows like Modern Family which are pseudo documentaries surrounding quirky families, this one is a pretty good comedy. The acting is great especially Michael J. Fox who plays an anchorman with parkinson's. To the shows credit it doesn't focus to much on the parkinsons issue although it does have a number of tongue in cheek jokes about it which is great. The characters are particularly developed although it has a great cast. In particular Wendell Pierce (know for the amazing series The Wire) who plays Mike's best friend, but his character doesn't get much to play with so far in the first season. Mostly this is a quirky family drama that tries to emulate a modern family style and is good, but not great. The kids are pretty funny, although I find the sister (Katie Finneran) character pretty annoying. It isn't nearly as funny as Modern Family and doesn't have depth of character, but I'd still say it's worth watching as it's light hearted and fun to watch.

#224 - Don Jon (2013) Review & Analysis

Don Jon (2013), Joseph Gordon-Levitt
3.5/ 5

When I first saw the trailer for this film I instantly lost interest thinking this was going to be one more mainstream comedy about a lothario who finds love in the typical romantic comedy style. When I first started watching it I was still a little dubious, but it's humorous style in editing, use of voice over and sound captured my interest pretty quickly. Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Jon plays a really convincing womaniser stepping away from his traditional hipster romantic type cast role. Instead he embraces this role of a nice guy who loves porn and explores his relationships with women. For the most part it's pretty accurate about relationships and it's pretty funny. It was great to see Scarlett Johansson and Gordon-Levitt play across from each other in these different roles. The way they play these Italian-American style characters really reminded me of The Sopranos even down to specifically Tony and Carmella, but of course there wasn't the same depth of development. Showing the frustrations of being in a committed relationship in a genuine way, that isn't arduous, but is instead are funny. You really find yourself on Jon's side for a lot of the movie and it's interesting to see his story arc. Especially since unlike other movies there's no montage of the token supporting characters story lines about their relationships. Instead it's really solidly focused on Jon's arc which is great. For the most part I thought it was pretty sex positive in this movie, but I found the ending to be a little too neat and brought into cliche somewhat and returned to a somewhat sex negative approach. Overall this is a pretty funny film that deals with some interesting issues, and while it isn't a deep drama it was very enjoyable to watch.

#223 - Inside Llewyn Davis (2013) Review

Inside Llewyn Davis (2013), Ethan and Joel Coen
3/5

The Coen brothers latest feature is pretty interesting, but perhaps not their best work in my opinion. With a really slow pace it focuses on the winding life of a folk singer trying to make it. Some may find the slow pace and lack of typical story ark kind of arduous and pretentious, but I quite liked this quirky story. It defies your expectations at every turn and it's humorous in a dry way rather than laugh out loud.

#222 - I love you, Man (2009) Review

I love you, Man (2009), John Hamburg
3/5

A funny and charming film. Good performances and Jason Segel is a favourite comedic actor of mine. It mimics the romantic comedy genre and is pretty truthful. It's great to see the male friendship being re-kindled in film. Overall pretty light hearted with some good laughs.

#221 - Boy, Interrupted (2009) Review

Boy, Interrupted (2009), Dana Heiz Perry
3.5/5

This is a heart wrenching documentary of a young boy suffering with severe mental illness and the struggle of their family. Includes many interviews and looks at the past including different treatments that were tried. Incredibly sad and hard to watch but an interesting eye opener to childhood mental illness.

#220 - Broken Flowers (2005) Review

Broken Flowers (2005), Jim Jarmusch
3.5/5

A strange and absurd film that feels like an old detective film, and is an oddball comedy. Bill Murray is great in this restrained role in this mid-life crisis character that is reflecting over his life. It has a great supporting cast dominated by strong female actors. This isn't a typical comedy, it has a very dry understated humour. Overall not really mainstream but a really interesting film which reminds me of films like Rushmore, The Royal Tennenbaums and Moonrise Kingdom (all directed by Wes Anderson) as well as The Squid and the Whale (Noah Baumbach).

#219 - Sex and the City (2010) Review

Sex and the City (2010), Michael Patrick King
2/5

Much more ridiculous than the first film. This film suffers from too much budget and the glossiness overrides any of the supposed portrayal of women. It's over the top with elaborate scenes including dance numbers and songs. Overall a lot of fluff and no substance to speak of.